Charles Schwab, Michael Illari, Southampton, Hamptons
27east.com

Story - News

Erosion and Hardening Shorelines Dominate Discussion at East Hampton Town Board Meeting

Publication: The East Hampton Press
By Rohma Abbas   Nov 13, 2012 6:08 PM
Nov 13, 2012 6:19 PM

East Hampton Town residents and business owners filled the Montauk Firehouse meeting room to standing-room-only capacity on Tuesday morning to sound off to the Town Board about how to best address the serious erosion and flooding Hurricane Sandy left in its wake.

The issue boiled down to whether hard structures should be allowed on the beach—a topic that proved to be a sensitive subject among speakers, especially to Steve Kalimnios, an owner of the company that manages the Royal Atlantic Beach Resort Motel in Montauk, who recently had contractors drop cesspool rings in front of his building to prevent further erosion that could have caused it to fall into the ocean.

Meanwhile, environmental advocates who oppose such structures say that the shoreline hardening only leads to more erosion to neighboring properties, and that a solution to the problem must be carefully thought out and not a simple knee-jerk reaction. In Mr. Kalimnios’s case, Jeremy Samuelson, the executive director of the Concerned Citizens of Montauk, has been a critic. He said the business owner had acted illegally in installing the cesspool rings because a town emergency permit didn’t specify such work, and town officials had no knowledge of the move. He also said the town code doesn’t permit hard structures on beaches.

Overall, however, speakers also took a broader perspective on the issue, as the general consensus from both business owners and environmentalists was that the town needs to come up with a long-term plan to address a community facing chronic erosion, rising sea levels and constant storms—before a very serious storm proves to be catastrophic to the region.

Talks, which spanned two and a half hours, focused on solutions like creating an erosion control tax district, drafting a hazard mitigation or post-storm recovery plan and assembling a committee or group to study the coastal erosion issue on the town level.

Mr. Kalimnios came prepared with posters of flooded town streets from the storm. Speaking loudly to the audience, he said he was “tired of getting vilified” for trying to protect his property. He pointed out that he and other businesses have spent enormous amounts of money to replenish beaches.

“We’ve been hemorrhaging money to make sure the beaches in the downtown community are beautiful and pristine so that customers coming to this community can enjoy it,” he said.

Mr. Samuelson began his remarks by pointing out that the audience was dealing with some “emotional issues.” He asked town officials a series of questions what they would do in a 20-percent catastrophic situation versus a 100-percent catastrophe. He said that what’s worse for the town than doing the wrong thing is “doing nothing” to address the problem on a long-term basis.

“If we wait to ask these questions after we find ourselves in a crisis, then quite frankly we will fail in the challenge that was presented to us,” he said.

Earlier, Bob Deluca, the president and CEO for the environmental organization the Group for the East End, also said the town needed a post-storm recovery plan, or a mitigation strategy in place, to give business owners and residents some level of necessary “certainty” on what to expect after a crisis.

Councilwoman Theresa Quigley said the current process is “failing our constituents.” She pointed out that the town code doesn’t contain provisions to protect structures, and instead mandates retreat. “To sit here and say we need a plan, we have a plan,” Ms. Quigley said. “And it doesn’t work,” as many in the audience burst into applause.

East Hampton Town Supervisor Bill Wilkinson and Councilman Peter Van Scoyoc also weighed in. Mr. Van Scoyoc said he’d be interested in exploring a sand control district, in which businesses and surrounding properties are taxed and those funds used to underwrite the replenishing beaches. Mr. Wilkinson said he’s concerned about the “economic ripple” on the businesses, claiming that businesses in downtown Montauk contribute $10 million a year to the town’s taxes.

“People who say let it fall in, I’m against it,” he said.

Others also delivered impassioned arguments. Keith Grimes, a contractor, said a coastal management plan would not work without allowing hardened structures. He pointed to situations like that of the East Deck Resort Motel whose owner, Alice Houseknecht, spoke earlier about severe flooding and damage to her property. Without shoreline hardening, she can stand by and watch “a manageable solution” turn into “a personal disaster,” Mr. Grimes said.

1  |  2  >>  

You have read 1 of 7 free articles this month.

Yes! I'll try a one-month
Premium Membership
for just 99¢!
CLICK HERE

Already a subscriber? LOG IN HERE

These people want to protect their buildings, not the beach. Why do you insist on costing us money , and costing us our beaches for your stupidity? You sound like this is something new.
By clamdigger (38), Quogue on Nov 13, 12 7:57 PM
1 member liked this comment
Shoreline hardening does not work long term. Please people, show me ONE Example of shoreline hardening that REVERSED erosion. It doesn't exist. Do you know why so many areas of the Jersey shore got pummeled from the storm? shoreline hardening.

The shoreline doesn't get harder than what's down at the Battery and it did nothing to prevent a flood of historic proportions.

George Washington fully understand coastal geology and basic oceanography when he ordered the Montauk Lighthouse ...more
By Nature (2572), Hampton Bays on Nov 13, 12 8:29 PM
2 members liked this comment
Ditto.

What's that word defined by someone repeating the same actions, and expecting different results?

In-Sand-ity!

By PBR (4364), Southampton on Nov 13, 12 10:13 PM
Keep it up and we will have no more beaches, anywhere! You can NOT stop the natural ebb and flow of the beaches..period! If you leave them alone and let them replenish themselves, build them up with dunes and beach grass, they will recover. You can hasten their demise by trying to remove the sand they shifted and building hardend structures to "protect" them.
By sandydog21 (98), Southampton on Nov 13, 12 11:21 PM
Growing up on the bay in North Sea, every now and then the house would flood. Nor easter with a full moon tide would do it. I remember waking up swiing my legs off the bed into a foot of ice cold sea water. It is something that stays with you forever and you feel violated. Living now 4 houses off the water, the March 2010 rains caused my yard and basement to flood with an estimated 50,000 gallons of storm water. Violated again. I have since taken measures to protect my home from that situation again. ...more
By North Sea Citizen (327), North Sea on Nov 14, 12 6:23 AM
Violated? Victimized? That's like jumping into a tigers cage at the zoo and saying you were a "victim" after it bites you.

Do you know how to prevent a home from flooding? Put it in pilings, no need for a bulkhead....
By Nature (2572), Hampton Bays on Nov 14, 12 8:44 PM
©2014, 27east.com / The Press News Group - Ph: 631-283-4100 - mailbag@27east.com