As the results rolled in showing that Bridget Fleming had captured the vacant Town Board seat on Tuesday by a comfortable margin, thunderous applause, cheers and chants filled the Southampton Town Democratic Committee headquarters.
Ms. Fleming, a Democrat from Noyac who also was endorsed by the Independence Party, was voted onto the board with 3,203 votes, or 54.6 percent of ballots cast, according to unofficial totals tallied by the Suffolk County Board of Elections. Her challenger, Republican William Hughes of Hampton Bays, garnered 2,662 votes, or 45.4 percent.
Ms. Fleming, 49, an attorney, and Mr. Hughes, 59, a retired Southampton Town Police Department lieutenant, were vying for the Town Board seat vacated when Anna Throne-Holst assumed the supervisor position in January.
“I’m thrilled,” said Ms. Fleming. “The Town Board has been in gridlock, like Anna [Throne-Holst] said, and now we can really start working.”
While the Democrats were cheering “Bridget! Bridget!” at their election party in Southampton Village, Southampton Town Republican Committee Chairman Ernest Wruck was across town in Hampton Bays telling the GOP supporters that it did not look like Mr. Hughes was going to make up the vote margin that night. Shortly after 9:30 p.m., Mr. Hughes thanked the crowd of more than 50 who gathered at Villa Tuscano and shared his surprise at the outcome.
“I’m the most shocked person this room,” he said. “I didn’t think it was going to go this way.”
About 16 percent of the town’s registered voters—5,865 out of 36,926—cast ballots in the special election, far more than the 10 percent that Gordon Herr, chairman of the Southampton Town Democratic Committee, said was expected.
The Democrats worked arduously to bring voters to the polls, Mr. Herr said. Ms. Fleming’s campaign committee sent absentee ballots to every household in Southampton Town, mailed postcards touting their candidate and went door to door supporting her. “We’ve done everything possible,” he said.
Robin Long, a member of Ms. Fleming’s campaign committee, noted that on Tuesday the Democrats set up call centers in Southampton, Remsenburg and Sag Harbor, and that volunteers were phoning to remind Democratic supporters to vote.
The Republicans also fought hard to draw voters to the polls. Mr. Wruck explained that it’s usually difficult to get out the vote in special elections, and turnout is very important. The Hughes campaign assigned two volunteers to each of the 42 electoral districts in Southampton Town to reach out to voters, and Mr. Hughes also personally visited voters in about half of those districts to solicit support, Mr. Wruck said. “That makes a real big difference, because it’s hands-on,” he said.
On Tuesday night, both Mr. Wruck and Mr. Hughes said they have to examine the numbers before commenting on voter turnout.
The margin of difference between the candidates was 541 votes. Of the votes cast for Ms. Fleming, 636 of them came on the Independence Party line. At the Democratic gathering at the restaurant 230 Elm in Southampton on Tuesday night, Steve Lynch, the party chairman, emphasized how important the Independents were.
“They clearly carried the day,” he said. “If you remove those 600 votes, we’re down to a dead heat. It was a big factor.”
At the Republican gathering, after the loss became apparent, Mr. Hughes repeated his belief that Southampton Town officials need to show fiscal restraint though this period of tough economic times, a campaign message he thought would garner him enough votes to win the special election. “I thought my platform was a good platform,” he said.



more





Add a comment
Total comments by highhatsize: 416
Total comments by BIGjimbo12: 64
Here's a novel idea, how about someone we can trust. Nope, to simple.
Total comments by Johnny Nova: 65
Total comments by reg rep: 140
Both candidates ran a good campaign. One wins one loses, thats the way it is, and you move on to the next one. Having said that, as a citizen of the town, I stand ready to give Ms. Fleming the opportunity to "show us what she's" got.
If taxes are your primary concern, look at your tax bill. Town candidates, regardless of party are put in the hot seat when taxes shoot up because of schools.
What is troubling, though, (and I felt the same in November before anyone attacks ... more me here) is this is a classsic, "tail wagging the dog" scenario. Frank McKay, and not the voters of Southampton determined who would win this seat.
Total comments by Terry: 336
Bridget won because this is a democracy and she got the most votes because she was the better candidate. This district has become overwhelmed with neocons, yet she still won because the actual "voters" were smart enough to make the sensible ... more choice.
Total comments by yearrounder: 208
"This "district" has become overwhelmed with neocons?" Please explain that one. What is a district? This was a town wide election with 42 election districts.
The point that I made, was that the margin of victory was ... more clearly due to the Independence line. Had Mr highes secured that line, he likely would have won. If you want to argue that point, go elsewhere, I am not getting onto that.
Who determined that Ms Fleming receive the Independence Line? Frank McKay who lives "up west"
Now I complimented Ms Fleming on her victory here, and that was indeed sincere. You havent heard sour grapes from me on this election or any other, no matter how you try to twist the words. The results are the results.
The voters may well determine who gets elected to office, but don't kid yourself, or attempt to act so naive, the parties determine who the voters vote for.
Total comments by Terry: 336
Total comments by number19: 68
Total comments by The_Realist: 6
Total comments by Terry: 336
This was a SOUTHAMPTON special election. Maybe you should get your glasses checked.
Total comments by lifesaver: 32
Total comments by sunshine: 28
Total comments by saltbox: 4
Total comments by danhfarrell: 3
Total comments by ICE: 272
Total comments by EQme: 107
ICE wrote:
@danhfarrell - Read this article which address the facts of their respective funding: http://www.27east.com/story_detail.cfm?id=264091
Total comments by BOReilly: 92
Shame on you!
Now please have the professionalism to leave this posted.
Total comments by VOS: 52
Total comments by BOReilly: 92
Total comments by Bridgehampton: 10
So don't ever think it had anything to do with having integrity.
Total comments by reg rep: 140
Sorry, for you that your man lost.... Happy for the balance of power his loss represents!
Total comments by ICE: 272
Now we can at least have an intelligent discussion between the 3 board members who actually give a damn about this town!
Total comments by EQme: 107
Total comments by North Sea Citizen: 135
(5456 - 3203 = 2253). Hmmmmmm . . .
Total comments by SamIAm: 35
Total comments by peoplefirst: 419
Total comments by blbandit: 6
Total comments by westendoftown: 3
Total comments by Terry: 336
Total comments by number19: 68
Total comments by cmac: 2
Total comments by sunshine: 28
The first step will be for the Town Board members to attend ALL scheduled work sessions and Town Board meetings. Tomorrow's work session was cancelled by ATH just a couple of days ago, and there is still no press release on the Town website announcing this. [The work session "agenda" is the ATH memo.]
Shameful attendance record IMO, similar ... more to the first Town Board work session after New Years (also cancelled).
Let's go folks, you for US!
Total comments by PBR: 431
Total comments by PBR: 431
Mr.Hughes may have been great in the military, and a good police officer, but as the PBA ad in the Press said last week, "there is no letter 'I' in the word 'Team' ."
Top-heavy directorial management styles have no place in Town government. Teamwork is what we need.
Let's all pull together going forward.
The ... more voters have spoken loudly and clearly.
Total comments by PBR: 431
I want you to read that ad again. It essentially states thast the concept of "chain of command" or "table of organization" is nothing but poppycock. By the reasoning presented in the argument, the Chairman of General Motors is responsible only to his 2 Vice-Presidents, and not the thousands of employees under him.
PBR further bables:
Mr. Hughes's shock at losing by such a wide margin shows how out of touch he is with ... more the public's dissatisfaction with the old Republican men's club order in Southampton.
Fill me in on this "Republican Men's Club" Would you care to see the stats on the number of women involved in the town GOP? Just for once, PBR, YOU do the work and look it up, inquire and get the answer.
The "shock" sir was real. Mr Hughes knocked on more doors than any candidate in a while in a very short election cycle. ( I wish they were all this short)
I'll repeat what I said above, this is classic "tail wagging the dog"
Both candidates ran a good campaign. Congrats to Ms Fleming.
Total comments by Terry: 336
Total comments by PBR: 431
Mr. Hughes ran a good campaign, but apparently Bridget ran a better one.
Let's see what she is made of...
Total comments by Mr. Z: 448
Despite very clear politcal philosohpical differences, both candidates and their volunteers deserve lot of credit for working extermely hard and with much passion, which produced a fairly high turnout for a special election. In that sense democracy was a winner.
That said when the final analysis is done, I suspect it will reveal that the unaffiliated voters (blanks and those who thought they truly registered as independent of any perty) were ... more the one who defined the outcome.
Again congratulations to Ms. Fleming and her team.
Total comments by DJII13: 136
Total comments by Bel: 52
Nevertheless, your vote for Bridget was a smart one.
Total comments by peoplefirst: 419
Total comments by Terry: 336
Remember everyone, elections have consequences, even if Terry doesn't like them. Congrats, Bridget!
Total comments by peoplefirst: 419
My challenge is to you for claiming that the Independence Party is "more in keeping with Republican ideals"
I sure do believe that the party leaders have an agenda. Independent or "blank" voters may not, but most assuredly the "Independence Party" does.
Total comments by Terry: 336
In special election a very low % of the community votes...that is spec ted /normal
Total comments by Bel: 52
If you read an article in the Press you will learn they have almost the same amount of money....
Total comments by Bel: 52
Total comments by pcon327: 1
Total comments by peoplefirst: 419
Total comments by EQme: 107
Total comments by peoplefirst: 419
Chris Nuzzi and Jim Malone put the final nail in Mr. Hughes' coffin at the last town board meeting. Thanks guys!
Total comments by Phaedrus: 8
Its nice to see someone run (and win) for elected position that is in it for the right reason, public service. That's what its really about. I find it so unfortunate that some politicos out there (in both towns, and I don't know the impetus for Mr. Hughes' campaign) who run (and unfortunately win) on a campaign based on grudges, bad faith, promises for political favors and revenge. That is how both Towns got and will continue to get into trouble.
We need more Bridgets!
Total comments by ehboardwatcher2010: 21
the point is she spent more and got less in a time when we need to spend less and get more. Hope this isnt an indication of how effective she will be on the town board.
Total comments by SamIAm: 35
Total comments by summertime: 37
Total comments by PrivateerMatt: 334
Total comments by rocky: 27
You and rabblerouser, however can go back under your rock where you feel most comfortable.
Total comments by Terry: 336
Total comments by PBR: 431
Total comments by rocky: 27
Total comments by rabbit: 43
Total comments by Turkey Bridge: 340
Total comments by Dodger: 46
Total comments by fidelis: 83
Had Mr. Hughes pledged to reform Town policy that allows unqualified cops to stay on the payroll at a cost of a million plus dollars a year, he would have won.
We may not be ideological, but were ARE frugal.
Perhaps next time.
Total comments by highhatsize: 416
Total comments by peoplefirst: 419
Total comments by blbandit: 6
Total comments by Bayman3142: 13
That aside, congrats to Ms Fleming
I wish her well in her representing the interests of the Town's residents.
Total comments by North of Highway: 211
Total comments by Talbot77: 14
Total comments by LMVT: 31
Thank you for your productive and intelligent posts here and on other article message boards.
Is your full name Terry Flanagan per your 2/26 post (2:09 PM) under another article here, and were you ever associated with Mr. Hughes's campaign?
Just curious for the facts, not some slam-down ad hominem attack.
Total comments by PBR: 431
Total comments by PBR: 431
Total comments by yearrounder: 208
Total comments by Bayman1: 208
Total comments by rabblerouser: 6
I couldn't agree more, with all due respect to Bill Hughes being a very good man.
It was Marietta Seaman and some of her republican cronies that caused this debacle. Help from Seaman is like the kiss of death, no one has any respect for the former town clerk. She was elected and then left for an up island job paying 150k. The robo call with her voice was a waste of time and money.
The only saving grace is that the Reps still have the majority.
These dems are scary ... more with their liberal agenda.
Total comments by reg rep: 140
Total comments by double standard: 125
Personally I thought Ms. Molinaro was a strong but unknown candidate who had a bright future with the Republican Party, if she had been willing (and she still maybe for all I know) and capable of doing the groundwork of getting to know the committee members as opposed to being thrust upon them.
But I think ... more both the heavy handed tactics of trying to force her canidacy upon the party and the petulant conduct of her benefactor in the aftermath has left her a pretty steep uphill road, if that remained her intention.
Your commentary on Mrs. Seaman is a head scratcher to me. Sounds like you have a personal ax to grind as opposed to an informed opinion.
Total comments by DJII13: 136
I have no ax to grind, this is just my opinion. Again, with all do respect to Mr. Hughes, I believe Ms. Molinaro would have been the winner last night if she had gotten the nomination. With 3 lines she could not have lost. Why did the conservative's leave the line blank? I don't look at the situation as annointing Thiele's hand picked candidate. I look at it as a win for a republican. So you would rather cut your nose off to spite your face?
Total comments by reg rep: 140
Total comments by DJII13: 136
Moving forward, Bishop has to go for sure, maybe Thiele too.
Total comments by reg rep: 140
Total comments by yearrounder: 208
That means Nuzzi and Malone will have an edge to gum things up if that's what the GOP wants. Hopefully they will put the needs of the town first and not the need to make Throne-Holst look ineffective ... more because they keep blocking her. But if they try to do that, I hope the voters pay attention.
But, even with the edge, there is still hope that Throne-Holst can muster 3 votes now and then with help from Graboski. The most stupid thing the GOP did was stab her in the back because of Zizzi and deny her the nomination. This showed those watching that if you want to be a GOP candidate for re-election, you better not vote your conscience ever. You must always do as told. Woke me up as to how mean spirited they can be.
Total comments by baywoman: 29
Total comments by sunshine: 28
If I were betting, I'd say that Chris Nuzzi and Jim Malone may well do just that, and vote against whatever the Supervisor presents, Bridget Fleming will be inclined to support ATH on many (though ... more not all) issues, and Nancy Graboski will often be the swing vote.
I wouldn't be projecting like this so early in the game if Mr. Nuzzi and Mr. Malone hadn't already shown their Party-of-No colors all this year. Also, I believe it's a good thing if our elected officials know that we'll be watching them, and what we'll be watching for.
Total comments by fidelis: 83
Total comments by double standard: 125
The republican party(according to the RNC) believes in deregulation, that corporations are equal to individuals, that insurance company profits are more important than health care, that banks and wall street should regulate themselves, that there is no room for government outside of tax breaks to the ... more rich and big business, that the free market is the answer to all evils - just to name a few.
More often than not, a candidate identifies themselves as a Republican or Democrat because they agree with that party's principles. As I said, that is not always the case, but more often than not it is. Hughes is the perfect example of someone who tows the party line. He proudly calls himself a conservative and time and again answered questions with republican party talking points. I vote for the candidate, not the party, but I look at the party first.
Total comments by peoplefirst: 419
But I do understand what your point.
My wish is that independents could participate in the primaries so we don't get stuck ... more with these polarizing candidates. A little moderation could do us all good.
On a local level, I would challenge our representatives to make decisions based on what is best for the people, not the party. Do any of them have the guts to do so?
Total comments by double standard: 125
Total comments by peoplefirst: 419
You want hope and change? Check back with me on Nov 11th.
Total comments by double-D: 41
Total comments by peoplefirst: 419
Total comments by double standard: 125
Viva Le Moderates!
Total comments by double standard: 125
Total comments by peoplefirst: 419
Total comments by grimag: 38
You guys just won't be happy until this liberal democrat agenda of ATH and Bridget ruin this town. The members on the TB can't always agree on issues. Did ATH and Nuzzi always agree with the past supervisor? ... more Anyone care to answer?
Ms. ATH ran on consensus building and bringing parties together? But all she has done is complain how obstructive the Rep have been and how the TB needs balance. Is that consensus building?????
Problem here is that ATH can't get along with others that disagree with her.
Total comments by reg rep: 140
Total comments by yearrounder: 208
Total comments by double standard: 125
Total comments by reg rep: 140
Total comments by yearrounder: 208
I'm sure the liberals will turn this town around but only for the worse outcome ever.
Total comments by reg rep: 140
Total comments by EQme: 107
Total comments by EQme: 107
Here's what I foresee as the debate in the Town Council. The Repugs will want to raise fees for everything and fire people. The Demogs will want to do the same thing but will couch their approbation in REALLY, REALLY apologetic language. (The Repugs will be apologetic too, but, since they are social darwinists, not nearly so sincere.)
Neither will say ... more bupkes about the twenty-seven cops @ $3.6M/yr. who are still on the payroll years after they should have retired and been replaced with new hires at 1/3 the cost.
Here's an idea for future consideration, just retire a few of them, just six of them, as Linda Kabot and the Chief of Police wanted to do in 2008. Use the hundreds of thousands of dollars saved thereby to mitigate the fees to use the beach, or to get a building permit, or to get a permit to run a (whatever)business.
Hey, you could, at least, put it on the agenda for a Town Council meeting. Then, if the STPD PBA members appear en masse in uniform, you could fire them, as you should have the first time, for insubordination.
Be warned, though, the PBA and the NYS Assn. of PBAs will sue for the violation of their right to be insubordinate. Just think of this as the cost of doing business. At this point in the development of the republic, it is safe to say that anyone who deprives anyone of anything that the latter think they deserve will be sued, as long as the allegedly deprived person has the cash to hire a lawyer.
Total comments by highhatsize: 416
Total comments by rabblerouser: 6
Total comments by DJII13: 136
We have been filled up with so much garbage that we have come to expect it, and worse ... more yet tolerate it.
Total comments by double standard: 125
Total comments by Dr Spock: 16
You state that 15% turnout is on the high side for a special election. Can you recall any contested special election in Southampton Town that had a lower turnout?
Total comments by highhatsize: 416
Total comments by peoplefirst: 419
So the 15% plus is charecterized as high compared with the rule of thumb for this type of election elsewhere which is 10%. You might look back to Assemblyman Fred Thiele's first election to the NYS Assembly which was also an off season special election and ... more draw some comparison there as part of the district encompasses Southampton should you choose to reject my assertion of the 10% rule of thumb.
Total comments by DJII13: 136
Would that have been a "special election" since it would be held coincident with a general election, or an "interim election?"
Total comments by Frank Wheeler: 696
Total comments by clamdigger: 12
Total comments by DJII13: 136
Total comments by EastEnd68: 240
Total comments by Bridgehampton: 10
Total comments by DJII13: 136
The claim that this condition of being fully engaged argues against ... more doing "more projects" employs a false premise, i.e., that doing all the paving that's needed this year (instead of just half) means "more projects". It doesn't mean that; it means that the same people will simply be doing the job to completion rather than stopping partway through while their boss goes back to the Town Board for money that should have been allotted in the first place.
If I'm wrong, and it's true that allocating the full amount that's needed for this year's paving would in fact necessitate further borrowing, I submit that this has to be done regardless. It's hard to think of a Town function more fundamental to the people's safety and promoting economic growth than keeping the roads in good repair.
Total comments by fidelis: 83
Add a comment