The Hampton Synagogue appears to have been considering an even larger symbolic Jewish religious boundary, known as an eruv, than it originally proposed for Westhampton Beach Village in 2008, according to a copy of a letter sent from an attorney to the house of worship in March.
Months after withdrawing its application with the village two years ago, officials with the Sunset Avenue synagogue apparently asked a Manhattan law firm to also investigate the bylaws of both Quogue and West Hampton Dunes villages, as well as Southampton Town, for reasons still unclear.
But Marvin Tenzer, the president of the East End Eruv Association—the non-profit organization that has been working to establish the larger symbolic boundary—adamantly maintains that the Westhampton Beach synagogue does not have a hand in his current push to... more
Months after withdrawing its application with the village two years ago, officials with the Sunset Avenue synagogue apparently asked a Manhattan law firm to also investigate the bylaws of both Quogue and West Hampton Dunes villages, as well as Southampton Town, for reasons still unclear.
But Marvin Tenzer, the president of the East End Eruv Association—the non-profit organization that has been working to establish the larger symbolic boundary—adamantly maintains that the Westhampton Beach synagogue does not have a hand in his current push to... more









more









Why should a religious group be able to make a mark on govt property?
God help his neighbors. If they thought that congestion, noise and garbage from his property were bad before, what will it be like when all Orthodox Jews from a geographical area four or five times the size of Westhampton Beach become participants?
One poster on this forum states that the NYS Court of Appeals has ruled that zoning laws are invalid against religion. I can't find any proof of this ...more statement but, if true, can you imagine the size of the new and improved Hampton Synagogue required to serve the needs of the augmented congregation?
Clearly, the eruv proposal must be rejected unless the Rabbi agrees in advance to close the synagogue on Sunset Avenue and build another where there are no neighboring homes occupied by innocent residents.
Gabreski Airport would be perfect. Rabbi Schneier would have his pick of a hundred different building sites without any inconvenience to residential neighbors.
threads on a telephone and that would make everything ok.. If you are not supposed to do something because of your religion on a certain day DO NOT DO IT! sounds to me they make the rules fit them So typical of them
But I had implored you awhile ago to drop the "bigot" comeback. You have used at waaaay too much and it now has the effectiveness of a car hown outside the midtwon tunnel.
When I am dealing with a winging three year old who has s single mindset and is on the verge of a tantrum, I often say "now don't take a davidsline with me young lady"
Shame works like a charm
and like before you are the BIGOT
Jews against the Evru. Check the Independant for the correct group name fighting it.
Your poor grammar put forth 'but I certainly seems more Jews are apposed to this than any other group of people". I won't correct you errors but I might call you out on the proof thta more jews are opposed than any other "group" (I take exception to group b/c if you are not a jew you are a gentile). I know seems is ...more a qualifier but let's just deal with facts.
People who live in the towns DO NOT WANT IT
But they just push,push, push themselves on everyone and they dont give a dam about anyone