I would like to thank the New York State Pine Barrens Commission for holding a public hearing on the proposed planned residential district “Lewis Road” development, formerly The Hills at Southampton planned development district, this coming Wednesday, February 19, at 2:30 p.m., conveniently at Riverhead Town Hall, 200 Howell Avenue in downtown Riverhead [“Pine Barrens Commission To Hold Public Hearing On Lewis Road Golf Course Proposal In East Quogue,” 27east.com, February 10].
I urge all my neighbors who treasure our Pine Barrens to attend and let the commission know of our appreciation for their time spent investigating the proposed golf course and ask that they consider our concerns on how this PRD will impact this very important Pine Barrens area and state-designated Special Groundwater Protection Area.
The Lewis Road PRD has similarities to The Hills at Southampton PDD (which was rejected by the Southampton Town Board) but eliminates many of the environmental extras that were included in the PDD. It also has different parameters for use of the golf course. Some differences may be better, some worse. The point is — it is different.
I believe it is inappropriate to apply a SEQRA review on The Hills at Southampton PDD proposal to this project currently before us, simply because it is proposed by the same developer on the same land.
We are lucky that the state formed the Pine Barrens Commission to oversee situations like this. I ask its members to reject this PRD proposal out of hand, based on the many issues cited in their own 15-page advisory comment memo to the Southampton Town Planning Board, or, at a minimum, to demand a SEQRA review specific to this project, which I believe is environmentally destructive to our beloved pine barrens.
Victoria Greenbaum
East Quogue
Come and Tell UsWhen Tim Bishop was our congressman, he held numerous town hall meetings with his constituents. They were raucous affairs. Those were the days of the Tea Party, and its members were outraged that the federal government was expanding health care...
A SuggestionI have a suggestion for Craig Catalanotto, who is on record for opposing cross-endorsements and for allegedly switching alliances from Democratic to Republican Party candidates, such as Cyndi McNamara and Stephen Kiely. When the Pine Barrens Commission was in the...
Followed Their LeadWhile I respect the journalistic integrity of The Southampton Press, I disagree with your editorial awarding the Southampton Village Ethics Board a “dunce cap” for Open Meetings Law violations [“Gold Stars and Dunce Caps,” Editorial, July 3]. The Ethics Board...
Shooting WildlyAs a 30-year litigation-scarred veteran of the sand mining/composting wars waged in Southampton Village and Town, I am a proponent of the amortization of sand mines proposed by the town. In our battles, we were up against the “pre-existing use”...
Wonderful TurnoutOn behalf of the Fourth of July Parade Committee and the Southampton Village Commission on Veterans Patriotic Events, I would like to thank the community for such a wonderful turnout for the Fourth of July parade. I would like to...
A More Nimble Plan“It feels like Southampton has lost its soul.” That’s how one local merchant recently described the state of our village business district. Many would agree. Local businesses reported a soft July 4, but a much better July 5 and 6....
A Simpler SolutionIt has taken me a few weeks to respond to the recent “Cup o’ Joe” newsletter, where Executive Editor Joe Shaw ventured onto an editorial limb, venting about village issues, particularly the controversy surrounding Pond Lane. Let’s set the record...
The New StandardThe editorial dunce cap for “creeping authoritarianism” [“Gold Stars and Dunce Caps,” Editorial, July 3] awarded to the president for his anger at the deliberate leak of a premature intelligence assessment by an individual acting solely out of malice in...
