Court Rejects Bid To Overturn Southampton Village Food Pantry Law, Paving Way For Heart Of The Hamptons Plan - 27 East

Court Rejects Bid To Overturn Southampton Village Food Pantry Law, Paving Way For Heart Of The Hamptons Plan

icon 1 Photo
The former ambulance barn on Meeting House Lane.  DANA SHAW

The former ambulance barn on Meeting House Lane. DANA SHAW

Brendan J. O’Reilly on May 17, 2022

A State Supreme Court justice has denied a petition from Meeting House Lane property owners who had asked the court to strike down a Southampton Village law that the Village Board adopted earlier this year to enable a food pantry to open at the former village ambulance barn.

The decision is a victory not only for the Village Board but for Heart of the Hamptons, a nonprofit that plans to move its food pantry operation from a church on Hill Street to the old ambulance barn on Meeting House Lane.

In a March 9 petition, Anton Borovina, the attorney for Meeting House Lane property owners Jim McFarlane, Joann Hale and Paul Fagan, argued to the court that the Village Board’s determination that the local law will not result in any significant environmental impacts was “arbitrarily and capriciously adopted, unlawful, null and void” and requested that the court declare the law itself “null and void.”

Acting Supreme Court Justice John H. Rouse did not agree. In a May 5 decision that was filed on Monday, Rouse wrote that the village had, in fact, undertaken the required review.

“The decision was not a surprise, because the village was on firm legal footing,” Mayor Jesse Warren said Monday.

The same neighboring property owners similarly sued after the village originally adopted the food pantry special exception use law in September 2021. In response, the Village Board voted in October 2021 to repeal the law rather than defend it in court.

Warren said at the time that the board would resolve the issues named in the lawsuit, hold another public hearing, and pass the legislation again.

That earlier lawsuit questioned whether the State Environmental Quality Review Act had been followed, stating that the Village Board failed to establish itself as the lead agency under SEQRA — which was required before the board could declare that environmental review was unnecessary.

To assuage concerns that there had not been adequate review, the village asked VHB, an engineering firm that was conducting a traffic study in the village, to add Meeting House Lane to the scope of its work. The village also had environmental consulting firm Nelson Pope Voorhis conduct a planning analysis regarding food pantries in January 2022, and the firm suggested that creating a special-exception use for food pantries in the village zoning code would be the best route, including implementing standards that would limit where a food pantry could operate in a residential district.

With the studies complete, the Village Board voted in February to adopt the food pantry law again. Then, in March, the board granted Heart of the Hamptons a special exception use permit.

“While the village’s repeated missteps reflect a failure to engage in the proper review in the first instance and past actions were ill-considered, it does not prevent them from correcting those errors to ensure its future course is proper,” Rouse wrote in his decision.

On Monday night, Heart of the Hamptons was before the Planning Board seeking site-plan approval, another necessary step before the nonprofit can begin operating on Meeting House Lane. The Planning Board scheduled a public hearing for June 20.

You May Also Like:

Upcoming Event in Southampton Village Will Provide Valuable Information to Homeowners Interested in Septic System Upgrades

Improving water quality — particularly the health of lakes and ponds — has been one ... 30 Oct 2025 by Cailin Riley

Elizabeth Spitz, Formerly of East Hampton, Dies October 15

Elizabeth Spitz, affectionately known to her close friends and family as “Betty,” peacefully passed away ... 29 Oct 2025 by Staff Writer

Southampton Police Reports for the Week of October 30

HAMPTON BAYS — A local resident told Southampton Town Police on October 20 that she had been the target of an attempted fraud scheme. She said she had received a call informing her that she was among nine winners of a multimillion-dollar lottery pool, but that she needed to send in a check for $3,400 to earn her portion of the much greater winnings. She mailed the check and was then told by the fraudsters that it had not arrived and that she should send another, which she did. But after discussing the matter with a family member, she realized ... by Staff Writer

A Sneak Peek at the Election Day Ballot in Southampton Town

The Election Day ballot for Southampton Town voters contains the races for Suffolk County legislator, Southampton Town supervisor and two council seats, the Southampton Town clerk, all five members of the Southampton Town Trustees, the highway superintendent and one of the four town justice seats, as well as uncontested elections for Suffolk County district attorney and Suffolk County sheriff, and two ballot propositions. Early voting polls remain open daily at Windmill Village in East Hampton, Stony Brook Southampton campus in Southampton and at St. Mark’s Episcopal Church in Westhampton Beach until this Sunday, November 2. On Election Day, polls will ... by Michael Wright

We Mark Our Ballots: The Propositions

There are two propositions on the ballot — as always, don’t forget to flip your ballot over! — that deserve attention. The first is a state measure that would clear the way for an Olympic skiing and trail facility on preserved land upstate. We recommend a yes vote, simply because it seems like a sensible use of valuable real estate for the benefit of that region and the entire state. However, the Suffolk County proposition, the second on the ballot, is a clear no. The measure would extend county legislators’ terms from two to four years, something voters have overwhelmingly ... by Editorial Board

We Mark Our Ballot: County Legislature

In an age punctuated by extreme political party divisions and acrimony, it was refreshing to hear from two Suffolk County legislators representing the East End — one a Democrat and one a Republican — about how well they worked together to represent the interests of their varied constituents and pass legislation to benefit all residents, regardless of political affiliation. It was downright astonishing to hear them heap praise upon each other, both personally and politically, during separate interviews with The Express News Group Editorial Board. This at a time when each is facing an active challenger. It became crystal clear ... by Editorial Board

Southampton School Board Approves Second $5 Million Loan To Cover Cash Flow Gap

Projecting a shortfall in critical funding, the Southampton Board of Education approved a second tax ... by Michelle Trauring

We Mark Our Ballot: Southampton Town

There are precious few choices for Southampton Town voters to make between now and November 4, a sad state of affairs based on well-documented horse trading that took place behind the scenes. The key swap made sure Maria Moore did not face a challenger for a second term as supervisor; in exchange, Charles McArdle, likewise, will cruise to a second term as highway superintendent. That both are doing a terrific job and deserve reelection is some consolation, but local government is always better when voters have choices. That was taken away from them, largely, this year by party leaders — ... by Editorial Board

Southampton's DeLalio Sinks Hole-in-One in Playoff Victory Over Kings Park

Colin DeLalio shined in the Southampton boys golf opener of the Section XI Team Tournament ... by Drew Budd

Flanders Road Affordable Housing Proposal Earns $2.4 Million Grant From Southampton Town; Residents Plead for Town To Derail 7-Eleven Plans

A proposal for a 40-unit affordable housing development that would be one of the first ... by Michael Wright